Wednesday, November 3, 2021

I DON’T TAKE SIDES BUT HEREUNDER ARE THE OPPOSING ARGUMENTS ON THE ISSUE FOR DISQUALIFICATION AGAINST FERDINAND R. MARCOS, JR OR BBM.

 

A short retrospect of the disqualification issue is that BBM was convicted for tax evasion which is a crime involving moral turpitude. The decision of the Court of Appeals became final and executory in 1995. In the COC of BBM, he stated he was never convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude. BBM clearly lied, thus, a case has been filed before the COMELEC for his disqualification.

THIS CAN BE THE ARGUMENT FOR THE DEFENSE:

The decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) cannot be executed anymore and has no force and effect because ten (10) years had already elapsed. Under the Rules of Court, the final decision must be executed within 5 years. After that, it can still be executed by filing an independent action within another 5 years. The BIR (Bureau of Internal Revenue) failed to do the two remedies; therefore, the decision is now unenforceable as it is a useless scrap of paper.

COUNTER ARGUMENT FOR THE COMPLAINANT:

The law on prescription cannot be applied against the government. The BIR being an instrumentality of the government, therefore, prescription does not apply.

Under the foregoing facts and circumstances, at the end of the day, it is ultimately the SC that will finally decide and put an imprimatur to the case, which will take 5 years or so it seems. In the meantime, BBM will remain as a candidate for president.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Your Ad Here