In the
news, last night, the Manila Water and the Maynilad, through their respective
representatives, backpedaled by expressing their willingness to forego the
Singapore arbitration award of 7 and 3 billion peso plus, respectively, and to
renegotiate the water concession contracts with the government just to buy
peace.
The
peoples’ stern warning intended to be taken seriously and committed to both
heart and memory to the two water firms, is that they should have been more
solicitous in its task to steer clear of blunders, especially their repetitions
and recidivism, and to keep their dealings rightfully and lawfully done. But
the two firms egregiously demonstrated their apparent incorrigibility showing
res ipsa loquitur ( the thing speaks for itself), a sinister pattern of bad
faith for money and to foist fraud upon the government and its citizens.
By
entering into a contract with the government the two water firms fully knew
that the same is unjust in the sense aforesaid then they must have acted
maliciously. Heretofore, it is their bad faith in the sense of a dishonest
purpose, that they must be prosecuted for PLUNDER and sees them rot in jail. No
amount of juggleries could dim this fact.
The
questioned actuation of the two water firms and the attendant circumstances
brook no explanation consistent with good faith or lack of malice and must be
counted as constitutive of a Capital offense. Under the circumstances apropos
the Maynilad and the Manila Water, there was an inexplicable series of
deceptions bereft of any redeeming feature and signifying fraud in the water
concession contracts.
To
condone the Maynilad and the Manila Water because of their offer not to collect
anymore the Singapore Arbitration award is no more in point to that of the
robber who admitted that he had held up numerous banks but he had already
stopped, therefore, he is now innocent.
The
behavior of the Maynilad and the Manila Water suggests no other conclusion than
that they deliberately wanted to cause the Filipino people extreme pain and
suffering regardless of the dictates of conscience and the imperatives of law.
It is crystal clear that the assailed water concession contracts are contrary
to law and are motivated by premeditated efforts to cause injustice.
No comments:
Post a Comment